According to Wyoming's constitutional provision, what should be true about bail?

The provision of Wyoming's constitution stipulates that bail shall not be excessive in non-capital cases, which aligns with the fundamental principles of fairness and justice in the legal system. This ensures that individuals who are charged with a crime have the right to post bail while awaiting trial, provided that the bail amount is reasonable and not punitive. The idea is to prevent extreme financial burdens from being placed on defendants, thereby supporting the presumption of innocence until proven guilty.

In non-capital cases, the constitution recognizes the importance of allowing defendants to remain free during legal proceedings, thus encouraging their participation in the judicial process and preventing undue hardship. This framework also acknowledges that restrictions on bail should not infringe upon an individual's rights and liberties unnecessarily, promoting a balanced approach to pre-trial release.

The other options do not align with the constitutional provision. For instance, excessive bail contradicts the principle of fairness, and stating that bail cannot be denied or should be granted in all cases overlooks specific circumstances where it may not be appropriate to grant bail, such as flight risk or danger to the community. The focus on non-excessiveness ensures that while bail is accessible, it remains within a framework that respects both the rights of the accused and the interests of justice.